
The future of Zain, the Arab world's second-largest telco, has been under the spotlight for months now.
After weeks of rumours, it emerged yesterday that
the Kharafi Group, a big Kuwaiti family company, has managed to amass 46 per cent of Zain's shares. It may not own them all directly, but it has them for sale. When you take out the
KIA, a sovereign fund that owns 25 per cent, and Zain itself, which holds 10 per cent of the company in treasury shares, that means Kharafi have managed to rope up about 70 per cent of all the Zain shares in free float on the market.
That's pretty incredible in and of itself, especially when,
as pointed out in The National today, at no point has the Kuwaiti stock market, Zain, or Kharafi actually made a disclosure about any of this. That the second-largest telco in the Arab world - and Kuwait's largest public company - can effectively be bought out without disclosure is a pretty amazing story.
More amazing is though, is the fact that somebody is about to pay about US$14 billion for less than half of Zain.
"It is such an expensive price tag," one analyst said to me yesterday.
"Far too expensive for a financial investor, and by any normal metric,
too expensive for a strategic investor."
So who is buying Zain? A
bunch of media reports in the last few days have said the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (Adia) is involved.
That is certainly not the case: to begin with, Adia does not invest
within the GCC, and it has also said publicly that it will not take
majority stakes or management control in big companies.
India's Reliance Telecom was often listed as a buyer, but
they denied being involved yesterday.
But two common themes keep running through all the rumours - an Abu
Dhabi fund is involved, and it is partnered with an Indian telco.
As
we say in The National today,
one interesting possibility is Essar - one of India's largest mobile
operators, and also one of its biggest diversified conglomerates -
which
announced a partnership with the Dhabi Group in July.
The Dhabi Group is a big, well financed investment company owned by
members of the Abu Dhabi royal family, and is often confused with a
sovereign fund (it isn't, it manages the personal wealth of the
royals).
Essar said it would link up with the Dhabi Group to make investments in
the African telecom market, where Zain is the continent's
second-biggest player.
Other than that, it is hard to imagine another Abu Dhabi - India hookup
that would have the right combination of interest and cash. Another
cashed up Abu Dhabi fund is
Invest AD
(the new name of the Abu Dhabi Investment Company) - it invests in the
region, and buys companies, but hasn't shown a lot of interest in
telecoms,
except for one deal involving Orascom Telecom last year.
There is always the chance of a new fund emerging, in the same way that
Abu Dhabi United Group
appeared out of nowhere and bought Manchester City football club last
year. But the Zain deal involves a far larger amount of money, and it
is hard to imagine such a big deal being done by an ad-hoc group of
investors.
(Photo by Yasser al Zayyat / AFP)
Excellent analysis, why only here is transparency discussed?
This will link to story covering consortium of investors:
http://rupertbumfrey.blogspot.com/2009/09/malaysian-indian-group-inks-zain-stake.html